Note: The DearEsq free 'ask a lawyer' site is offered as a free informational service to the public and is not intended as legal advice. Laws vary from state-to-state, and in addition every situation is unique, and relevant facts may not be known. The answer to the question posed below may not apply to in your state or to your situation. For legal advice in your state and your situation you should consult with an attorney in your state who is familiar with the rules and laws in your state.
There are nine community property states in the United States. The nine community property states are Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington and Wisconsin.
Community property states attempt to divide all marital property evenly between husband and wife. This is distinguished from other, “equitable distribution” states, in which the Court is supposed to look at the whole picture of the family’s assets, debts, and resources, and determine what the most equitable division of each, or the total taken as a whole, would be.
In community property states, generally speaking, each party (husband and wife) at the time of divorce or death is entitled to end up with exactly half of the value of the total value of the family assets and resources, minus any family debt and other adjustments (such as exempting property which either the husband or wife owned prior to the marriage).
While this may sound very simple on first blush, consider issues such as “how do you value stock options, and are they the fruit of the marriage (the “community”) or of the person earning the options?”, and “what happens if one spouse has a business prior to the marriage, and during the marriage the other spouse works at the business, increasing its value?” While there are many (and often competing) formulas for working out the right answers to these questions, they serve to demonstrate just how complicated community property issues can be.
Many legal commentators think that the community property system is more fair, as it attempts to force an equal division of the family property, or at least of the value of the property. Others think that giving the Court more discretion to award property or other assets unevenly, as circumstances may suggest